\documentclass[12pt]{amsart} \usepackage{amscd} \def\opn#1#2{\def#1{\operatorname{#2}}} \opn\Ext{Ext} \opn\ini{in} \opn\Gin{Gin} \opn\chara{char} \begin{document} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{center} {\sc Abstract: Sequentially Cohen-Macaulay modules and local cohomomology} {Juergen Herzog} \end{center} \medskip \noindent In a combinatorial context Stanley introduced the notion of sequentially Cohen-Macaulay %%@ modules, and calls a simplicial complex sequentially Cohen-Macaulay over a field $K$ if the %%@ Stanley Reisner ring $K[\Delta]$ is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. This is implied over any %%@ field $K$ by the hypothesis that the Alexander dual of $\Delta$ is non-pure shellable in the %%@ sense of Bj\"orner and Wachs. For all $k\geq 0$, the simplicial complex $\Delta^{(k)}$, which is generated by all %%@ $k$-dimensional faces of $\Delta$ is called the pure $k$-skeleton of $\Delta$. It has been %%@ shown by Duval that $\Delta$ is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay over $K$ if and only if the pure %%@ $k$-skeleton of $\Delta$ is Cohen-Macaulay over $K$ for all $k\geq 0$. Peskine gave a nice homological characterization of sequentially Co\-hen-Macaulay modules. He %%@ showed that over a local (or standard graded) Cohen-Macaulay ring with canonical module %%@ $\omega_R$, a finitely generated (graded) module is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay if for any %%@ $0\leq i\leq \dim R$, the module $\Ext^i(M,\omega_R)$ is either $0$ or Cohen-Macaulay of %%@ dimension $\dim R-i$. In this lecture a joint result with Sbarra will be presented in which we give another %%@ surprising characterization of sequentially Cohen-Macaulay modules. The result, in the case of %%@ graded rings, says the following: Let $K$ be a field, let $I\subset R$ be a graded ideal in %%@ the polynomial ring $R=K[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$, and let $\Gin(I)$ denote the generic initial ideal %%@ of $I$ with respect to the reverse lexicographical order. Then the local cohomology modules %%@ of $R/I$ and $R/\Gin(I)$ have the same Hilbert functions, if and only if $R/I$ is %%@ sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. Notice that for arbitrary ideals the Hilbert functions of the %%@ local cohomology modules of $R/I$ are only bounded above by those of $R/\Gin(I)$. A similar result can be shown for simplicial complexes. Kalai introduced the symmetric %%@ algebraic shifted complex $\Delta^s$ of $\Delta$. It is known that $\Delta$ and $\Delta^s$ %%@ share many basic properties, while on the other hand $\Delta^s$ has a much simpler %%@ combinatorial structure than $\Delta$. We show that $\Delta$ is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay %%@ over $K$ if and only if the local cohomology modules of $K[\Delta]$ and $K[\Delta^s]$ have the %%@ same Hilbert function. \end{document}